Publication Ethic

Duties For Editor

  1. Publication Decision: Editor has right to accept, reject or ask some improvements of the manuscript which has been sent by author based on the reviewer and journal selingkung. Editors can be guided by the policy of editorial boards of journal and limited by legal requirements related to defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Related to the manuscript decision, editorial team can communicate with another editor in decision making of the manuscript. Editorial team responsible for every manuscript published.
  2. Manuscript Review: Editor conducts initial review as a process that, every manuscript within the journal should use the selingkung style of journal. Editor ensures the process of peer review is running wisely, fairly and confidentially. Editor should send the manuscript to reviewer in related fields and it is free from conflict of interest. Editor should ensure that the process of peer reviewer is using double blinded.
  3. Fair Play: Every manuscript should be accepted based on the weight of the contents without consider gender, race, religion, nationality, and others from the author.
  4. Confidentiality: Editor should have obligation to keep the confidentiality from the authors’ information.
  5. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Every decision towards the manuscript based on the approval from the author, editor and redactor should be free from the every form of conflict of interest.

 

Duties For Reviewer

  1. Contribution for Editor Decision: Peer Reviewer gives review in order to give consideration to the editor decision and also improve the paper quality. Reviewer can give consideration based on the objective assessment from the manuscript assigned by editor.
  2. Confidentiality: Reviewers should maintain the confidentiality from the manuscript reviewed. Every manuscript assigned by the editor must be confidential and should be used as it should. The confidentiality of manuscript oblige reviewer not to discussing or even asking the personal data from author without editor permission.
  3. Objective Standard: Reviewer should conduct the review process objectively without any interest or influence from other parties. Reviewer should give notes for the manuscript based on the clear arguments and supporting the statement.
  4. Recognition Source: Reviewer should be able to ensure all data sources utilised by author are valid and accountable. Reviewer should be able to inform the editor if finding discrepancies or deviation on publication ethics like the use of irrelevant data, the plagiarism of the published works, the discrepancy on duplicate duplication, or the other suspicion with the right argumentation.
  5. Conflict of Interest: Various data related with the process of peer review should maintain each confidentiality and not for personal interest. Evaluation review by reviewer should be free from conflict of interest and hence can produce the quality and competitive manuscript.
  6. Punctuality: Reviewer should conduct the review based on the deadline given by the editor. If there is an obstacle in the process of peer review then the reviewer should inform the editor to find another reviewer.
  7. Unrelated Field: Reviewers assigned to the field which is unrelated to their field of study can inform the editor to reject the review process.

 Duties For Author

  1. Report Standard: Author should submit the accurate and original research within the article. Every report made by the author is not manipulative, dishonest and inappropriate data, however, it should present the actual data. Manuscript should have the rules of scientific works and have credible sources which allow others to develop that work. Various form of discrepancies presented by author cannot be accepted by Journal manager.
  2. Duplicate Publication, Reduction, or : Author cannot do submission with the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time. This phenomenon is unethical action and cannot be accepted.
  3. Manuscript originality and plagiarism. The author must ensure that every work written is truly original work originating from the work. Authors must use appropriate citation/citation procedures when citing other people's works.
  1. Source Acknowledgment: Authors must provide acknowledgment of the data sources used in scientific manuscripts written using citations. This is a form of acknowledgment of other people's work which should be carried out in the procedures for writing scientific papers.
  1. Article Authorship. Each individual in authorship must representably reflect the accuracy and contribution in the work and reporting of the scientific work. Authorship should be limited to the individual who actually wrote and did the work. Every writer who works significantly must get into writing. Each author has also approved the form of the manuscript to be published.
  1. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest. Authors must be able to disclose all types of possible conflicts of interest regarding their writing and funding issues that are likely to influence the interpretation of their work. Any financial support associated with the manuscript must be disclosed.
  1. Fundamental Errors in Published Works. If fundamental problems are found regarding published works, the author must contact the editor to take steps to take action, such as withdrawing or correcting the manuscript.