IDENTITAS KEAGAMAAN YANG INKLUSIF DALAM KONTEKS RUANG DIGITAL UNTUK MEMBANGUN PERDAMAIAN
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract: Religious fanaticism and intolerance have increasingly proliferated in the digital space. The rise of individualism, where people often prioritize personal interests over collective well-being, contributes to the growing polarization and separation. The research aims to dig deeper into religious phenomena in the digital space and understand the discourse of scholars' perspectives to build a spirit of inclusivity and interfaith peace. This research uses the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) method, which descriptively examines the necessary texts and documents and criticizes them. The theoretical analysis departs from the views of Amartya Sen and F. Budi Hardiman. The results show that Sen emphasizes the importance of not only affiliating with a singular identity but realizing and appreciating the multiplicity of identities. Hardiman elaborates on the importance of ethical moral principles in digital space to prevent religious fanaticism. Both Sen and Hardiman emphasize the importance of inclusivity in fostering interfaith peace solidarity in the public sphere through respecting the difference of perspectives and identities of others.
Abstrak: Fanatisme dan intoleransi beragama telah dan sedang menjamur di ruang digital dewasa ini. Setiap orang hidup secara individualis dan mengabaikan kebaikan bersama, sehingga seringkali menciptakan polarisasi hingga perpecahan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggali lebih dalam fenomena keagamaan dalam ruang digital, dan memahami diskursus pandangan para ahli dalam rangka membangun semangat inklusivitas dan perdamaian antaragama. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), yaitu meneliti secara deskriptif teks dan dokumen yang diperlukan dan mengkritisinya. Analisis teori berangkat dari pandangan Amartya Sen dan F. Budi Hardiman. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Sen menekankan pentingnya tidak hanya berafilisasi pada identitas tunggal, tetapi menyadari dan menghargai keragaman identitas. Hardiman mengelaborasi pentingnya prinsip moral etis dalam ruang digital untuk mencegah fanatisme beragama. Baik Sen dan Hardiman sama-sama memberi penekanan pada pentingnya semangat inklusivitas untuk membangun solidaritas perdamaian antaragama dalam ruang publik melalui penghargaan terhadap perbedaan perspektif dan identitas orang lain.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
A. B. Menoh, Gusti. Agama Dalam Ruang Publik: Hubungan Antara Agama Dan Negara Dalam Masyarakat Postsekuler Menurut Jurgen Habermas. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2015.
A. Riyanto, Eko. Metodologi: Pemantik & Anatomi Riset Filosofis Teologis. Malang: Widya Sasana Publication, 2020.
Agustina, Lidya. “Viralitas Konten di Media Sosial.” Majalah Semi Ilmiah Populer Komunikasi Massa 1, no. 2 (Desember 2020): 149–160.
“Aristotle’s Philosophy: Eudaimonia and Virtue Ethics.” Accessed December 9, 2024. https://www.thecollector.com/aristotle-philosophy-virtue-ethics-eudaimonia/.
Brewster, Helen Gibson & Mike Gunning, Ben. “Policing the Community Together: The Impact of Technology on Citizen Engagement.” In Societal Implications of Community-Oriented Policing and Technology. Georgios Leventakis&M. R. Haberfeld. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, 2018.
Budi Hardiman, F. Aku Klik Maka Aku Ada: Manusia Dalam Revolusi Digital. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2021.
Bustami, Alya Rahmayani Siregar, Azrai Harahap, and Mahardhika Sastra Nasution. “Etika Komunikasi Media Digital di Era Post-Truth.” Jurnal Paradigma: Jurnal Multidisipliner Mahasiswa Pascasarjana Indonesia 5, no. 1 (2024): 39–53.
Chrysostomos Epafras, Leonard. “Jalan Ninja Ketujuh: Memahami Agama Digital Di Ruang Hibrida.” In Studi Antaragama: Metode Dan Praktik. Zainal Abidin Bagir et al. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2023.
D. Ashmore, Lee Jussim & David Wilder, Richard. Social Identity, Intergroup Conflict, and Conflict Reduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Demaria, Francesco, Maria Pontillo, Cristina Di Vincenzo, Domenica Bellantoni, Italo Pretelli, and Stefano Vicari. “Body, Image, and Digital Technology in Adolescence and Contemporary Youth Culture.” Frontiers in Psychology 15 (October 23, 2024): 1445098.
Detiknews. “TikToker Morteza Tersangka Penistaan Agama Kristen Ngaku Keceplosan,” n.d. Accessed June 9, 2024. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6997621/tiktoker-morteza-tersangka-penistaan-agama-kristen-ngaku-keceplosan.
Dua, Mikhael. “Freedom of Speech in Digital Communication: Rafael Capurro’s Cultural Approach to Self-Formation.” Jurnal Filsafat 34, no. 1 (February 29, 2024): 65–85.
Hadi, Mashal. “Media Sosial: Manfaat Dan Risiko Bagi Masyarakat.” In Invasi Media Massa. Bhekti Setyowibowo&Damas Y. L. Loda. Malang: Media Nusa Creative, 2015.
Hovik & G. Anthony Giannoumis, Sissel. “Lingkages Between Citizen Participation, Digital Technology, and Urban Development.” In Citizen Participation in the Information Society. Sissel Hovik et al. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022.
Jonathan, Paulus Widjaja & Fatimah Husein, Andreas. “Fostering Religious Exclusivism and Political Pluralism in Indonesia Through Interfaith-Based Student Community.” The 1st International Conference on Sout East Asia Studies, 2016, KnE Social Sciences (2018): 53–70.
Latipah & Nawawi, Haerul. “Perilaku Intoleransi Beragama Dan Budaya Media Sosial: Tinjauan Bimbingan Literasi Media Digital Di Masyarakat.” Al-Isyraq: Jurnal Bimbingan, Penyuluhan, dan Konseling Islam 6, no. 2 (2023): 21–42.
M. N. Hehanussa, Jozef. “Radicalism, Religious Fanaticism and Challanges for Indonesia Plurality.” Studies in Interreligious Dialogue 27, no. 1 (2018): 127–146.
Mofferz, Marz Wera. “Meretas Makna Post-Truth: Analisis Kontekstual Hoaks, Emosi Sosial dan Populisme Agama.” Societas Dei: Jurnal Agama dan Masyarakat 7, no. 1 (April 30, 2020): 3.
Muh. Ikhsan, Hamdan. “The Future of Public Spaces and Inclusive Islam.” IAIN Batusangkar (2018): 113–120.
News Indonesia, BBC. “Lina Mukherjee Divonis Dua Tahun Atas Penistaan Agama, Kasusnya Dinilai ‘berlebihan’ - ‘Itu Juga Dosa Dia, Bukan Dosa Kita,’” n.d. Accessed June 9, 2024. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/ckrk1rp9yrdo.
Nye, Malory. The Basics. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2004.
Orjuela, Camilla. The Identity Politics of Peacebuilding. India: SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd, 2008.
Qodir, Zuly. Radikalisme Agama Di Indonesia: Pertautan Ideologi Politik Kontemporer Dan Kekuasaan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2014.
S. Widjaja & Imanuel Geovasky, Paulus. Modul Religiusitas Perdamaian Berbasis Pancasila. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Taman Pustaka Kristen Indonesia, 2023.
Sen, Amartya. Identity and Violence. New York: W. W. Norton & Company Ltd., 2006.
Sugeng Widjaja, Djoko Prasetyo Adi Wibowo, Imanuel Geovasky, Paulus. “Politik Identitas Dan Religiusitas Perdamaian Berbasis Pancasila Di Ruang Publik.” GEMA TEOLOGIKA: Jurnal Teologi Kontekstual dan Filsafat Keilahian 6, no. 1 (April 2021): 95–126.
Team, Ruangguru Tech. “Apa Itu Post Truth, Dampak, Dan Yang Harus Kita Perbuat,” January 26, 2021. Accessed December 9, 2024. https://www.ruangguru.com/blog/post-truth.
“Types of Social Action According to Max Weber.” Your Article Library, December 1, 2014. Accessed December 9, 2024. https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/sociology/types-of-social-action-according-to-max-weber/43755.
Worden, Kirsten J. “Disengagement in the Digital Age: A Virtue Ethical Approach to Epistemic Sorting on Social Media.” Last modified 2019. Accessed December 9, 2024. https://philpapers.org/rec/WORDIT.
Zur, Michael. “«Homo Deus» and the Impact of Digitalization on Society.” Yuval Noah Harari, July 20, 2017. Accessed December 9, 2024. https://www.ynharari.com/homo-deus-impact-digitalization-society/.